Twitter
- There is often too focus on impact factors but the editorial board of @CamJRES is happy with an IF of 4.48 (5 year=6.16). 3 days ago
- RT @Spencer_DavidA: Just noticed this paper is free to read. No automation please, we’re British: technology and the prospects for work ht… 2 weeks ago
- RT @billjaneway: via @NYTOpinion Excellent op ed by @DianeCoyle1859 on women disproportionately cross the “production boundary” with no c… 2 weeks ago
- RT @KamiarMohaddes: Is the path to recovery still too optimistic, even after this June revision? twitter.com/MichaelKitson/… 2 weeks ago
- The IMF expects a deep global downturn in 2020 and a ‘sluggish turnaround’ in 2021 but with a sharply rebounding Ch… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
-
Recent Posts
- Forget Super Thursday, the Bank of England can only offer Mildly Useful Thursday
- Ignore the mudslinging – Corbyn would be a sound option for Labour
- Budget 2015: cuts to make Daily Mail readers wince, but not just yet
- David Cameron’s red light zone is closer to home than he thinks
- How to shape economic policy when we move beyond GDP
Archives
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2013
Austerity: we are not all in it together
Available at the OUP Blog
Posted in economic policy, regions
Leave a comment
