Twitter
- There is often too focus on impact factors but the editorial board of @CamJRES is happy with an IF of 4.48 (5 year=6.16). 3 days ago
- RT @Spencer_DavidA: Just noticed this paper is free to read. No automation please, we’re British: technology and the prospects for work ht… 2 weeks ago
- RT @billjaneway: via @NYTOpinion Excellent op ed by @DianeCoyle1859 on women disproportionately cross the “production boundary” with no c… 2 weeks ago
- RT @KamiarMohaddes: Is the path to recovery still too optimistic, even after this June revision? twitter.com/MichaelKitson/… 2 weeks ago
- The IMF expects a deep global downturn in 2020 and a ‘sluggish turnaround’ in 2021 but with a sharply rebounding Ch… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
-
Recent Posts
- Forget Super Thursday, the Bank of England can only offer Mildly Useful Thursday
- Ignore the mudslinging – Corbyn would be a sound option for Labour
- Budget 2015: cuts to make Daily Mail readers wince, but not just yet
- David Cameron’s red light zone is closer to home than he thinks
- How to shape economic policy when we move beyond GDP
Archives
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: September 2014
Osborne’s four myths mean he hits the poor and helps the rich
George Osborne performed his main role at conference: to produce some good news to deflect attention from defection and deviance. Abolishing death taxes while targeting tax avoiders sounds good and the Tory faithful loved it. And this is good news … Continue reading
Posted in economic policy
Leave a comment
