Twitter
- There is often too focus on impact factors but the editorial board of @CamJRES is happy with an IF of 4.48 (5 year=6.16). 3 days ago
- RT @Spencer_DavidA: Just noticed this paper is free to read. No automation please, we’re British: technology and the prospects for work ht… 2 weeks ago
- RT @billjaneway: via @NYTOpinion Excellent op ed by @DianeCoyle1859 on women disproportionately cross the “production boundary” with no c… 2 weeks ago
- RT @KamiarMohaddes: Is the path to recovery still too optimistic, even after this June revision? twitter.com/MichaelKitson/… 2 weeks ago
- The IMF expects a deep global downturn in 2020 and a ‘sluggish turnaround’ in 2021 but with a sharply rebounding Ch… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
-
Recent Posts
- Forget Super Thursday, the Bank of England can only offer Mildly Useful Thursday
- Ignore the mudslinging – Corbyn would be a sound option for Labour
- Budget 2015: cuts to make Daily Mail readers wince, but not just yet
- David Cameron’s red light zone is closer to home than he thinks
- How to shape economic policy when we move beyond GDP
Archives
Categories
Meta
Category Archives: economic history
More quantitative easing is not the answer to stagnation
Read on the Guardian’s website
The Benefits of a Plan B: Lessons from the Interwar Period
A reoccurring refrain in British political discourse is that there are few if any options in the conduct of economic policy. In the 1980s, Mrs Thatcher proclaimed that ‘there is no alternative’; more recently, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George … Continue reading
Posted in economic history, economic policy
Leave a comment
Does Manufacturing Matter?
Prior to the financial crisis and the era of austerity, the manufacturing sector in the UK was benignly neglected by politicians of all persuasions. But a political consensus has now emerged around the need to rebalance the economy, with a … Continue reading
Posted in economic history, manufacturing, Uncategorized
Leave a comment
